OK, so here's the deal.
I went out to my car today and noticed that the tire pressure on all the tires were at 37-38 psi.
In the door jam, it recommends 32 psi.
Hmm, well that could have a small effect on my 1/4 mile runs, specifically traction.
So I decided to go out to the exact same desolate highway I have used many times before and used the other day when I did the tests in the link below to see if I could better the times:
1 4 mile runs....on the street...stock SRT Hellcat Forum
All the same disclosures apply.
Car is still completely stock, not a performance mod, weight reduction mod, and no race gas in tank, nothing.
Stock car, stock summer Pirelli tires.
The differences this time:
Car now had 675 miles on odometer (not even 100 miles more since last test).
Tires were set to 32 psi rear, 34 psi front.
I had just over 1/4 tank of the same Shell 93 Octane I had a few days ago. Then I had just under 3/4 tank, so I had about 6-7 gallons less fuel this time.
The temps then were 70 degrees with 91% humidity and a DA of 950 or so feet.
The temps this time were 65 degrees with 59% humidity and a DA of 475 feet.
RESULTS:
First run:
60 foot of 2.2 seconds
0-60 in 3.8 seconds
0-100 in 7.4 seconds (improvement of .2 seconds)
60-130 in 8.0 seconds (improvement of .4 seconds)
1/4 mile in:
11.7 @ 129.0 (same ET but trap went from 127.4 to 129.0)
2nd complete run:
60 foot in 2.1 seconds
0-60 in 3.7 seconds
0-100 in 7.4 seconds
60-130 in 8.0 seconds
1/4 mile in:
11.6 @ 128.5
3rd complete run:
Basically same as 2nd run but 1/4 was
11.6 @ 128.0
**a bit of heat soak was kicking in. I did these passes almost back to back.
I'd pull over on the side of the road and turn off engine for 2-3 minutes a couple times if I saw headlights coming from a mile or so away, but I also had 3-4 busted runs in between where I spun too much, stopped, and then went right away again seconds later.
So without proper cool down the traps began to drop with the heat soak.
So, dropping my tires to the 32 psi did nothing for better launch.
On the street on the stock summer tires, inflated to factory recommendations, it may be hard to get a better than 2.1 60 foot time.
But the better DA clearly came into play and showed how low DA's help a lot.
best ET is now 11.6
best trap of 129 mph.
I think my predictions of 11.5 on the street stock is real, with a sea level DA.
And I'm super stoked about the 129.0 trap speed.
With sea level DA, I'm hoping for 11.5 at 129+
On a side note, anybody who may be thinking they would discount these times as it's not a drag strip, I'd say, well then you better discount nearly all automotive journal/magazine's (like Motor Trend and Car & Driver) times you read then too, as I'm using the exact same GPS based VBox performance meter nearly every one of them use. The industry standard really.
One could also argue that drag strips are no more accurate as you are relying on their timing lights being accurately set up and spaced, and maintained, and they use VHT chemicals and heat to make the launch pad sticky, which always helps ET's. Plus some drag strips run a bit uphill or even downhill, NHRA accepts a bit of variance. The road I'm using is dead flat, you can see it, and verified on Google Earth. I either video taped or took photos of the VBox for verification too.
I will be taking the car to the drag strip soon too. But in the past when I've compared the VBox to the drag strips, they are almost always within .05-.075 time and within .5 mph of each other, sometimes basically dead on.
Good times and was stoked with the results. Car is a beast and it's not even fully broke in yet.
I went out to my car today and noticed that the tire pressure on all the tires were at 37-38 psi.
In the door jam, it recommends 32 psi.
Hmm, well that could have a small effect on my 1/4 mile runs, specifically traction.
So I decided to go out to the exact same desolate highway I have used many times before and used the other day when I did the tests in the link below to see if I could better the times:
1 4 mile runs....on the street...stock SRT Hellcat Forum
All the same disclosures apply.
Car is still completely stock, not a performance mod, weight reduction mod, and no race gas in tank, nothing.
Stock car, stock summer Pirelli tires.
The differences this time:
Car now had 675 miles on odometer (not even 100 miles more since last test).
Tires were set to 32 psi rear, 34 psi front.
I had just over 1/4 tank of the same Shell 93 Octane I had a few days ago. Then I had just under 3/4 tank, so I had about 6-7 gallons less fuel this time.
The temps then were 70 degrees with 91% humidity and a DA of 950 or so feet.
The temps this time were 65 degrees with 59% humidity and a DA of 475 feet.
RESULTS:
First run:
60 foot of 2.2 seconds
0-60 in 3.8 seconds
0-100 in 7.4 seconds (improvement of .2 seconds)
60-130 in 8.0 seconds (improvement of .4 seconds)
1/4 mile in:
11.7 @ 129.0 (same ET but trap went from 127.4 to 129.0)
2nd complete run:
60 foot in 2.1 seconds
0-60 in 3.7 seconds
0-100 in 7.4 seconds
60-130 in 8.0 seconds
1/4 mile in:
11.6 @ 128.5
3rd complete run:
Basically same as 2nd run but 1/4 was
11.6 @ 128.0
**a bit of heat soak was kicking in. I did these passes almost back to back.
I'd pull over on the side of the road and turn off engine for 2-3 minutes a couple times if I saw headlights coming from a mile or so away, but I also had 3-4 busted runs in between where I spun too much, stopped, and then went right away again seconds later.
So without proper cool down the traps began to drop with the heat soak.
So, dropping my tires to the 32 psi did nothing for better launch.
On the street on the stock summer tires, inflated to factory recommendations, it may be hard to get a better than 2.1 60 foot time.
But the better DA clearly came into play and showed how low DA's help a lot.
best ET is now 11.6
best trap of 129 mph.
I think my predictions of 11.5 on the street stock is real, with a sea level DA.
And I'm super stoked about the 129.0 trap speed.
With sea level DA, I'm hoping for 11.5 at 129+
On a side note, anybody who may be thinking they would discount these times as it's not a drag strip, I'd say, well then you better discount nearly all automotive journal/magazine's (like Motor Trend and Car & Driver) times you read then too, as I'm using the exact same GPS based VBox performance meter nearly every one of them use. The industry standard really.
One could also argue that drag strips are no more accurate as you are relying on their timing lights being accurately set up and spaced, and maintained, and they use VHT chemicals and heat to make the launch pad sticky, which always helps ET's. Plus some drag strips run a bit uphill or even downhill, NHRA accepts a bit of variance. The road I'm using is dead flat, you can see it, and verified on Google Earth. I either video taped or took photos of the VBox for verification too.
I will be taking the car to the drag strip soon too. But in the past when I've compared the VBox to the drag strips, they are almost always within .05-.075 time and within .5 mph of each other, sometimes basically dead on.
Good times and was stoked with the results. Car is a beast and it's not even fully broke in yet.