Glad to hear Speedy. I am at 2,500 miles and ran mine Friday night in the 9s again. All runs great. The car is simply amazing on the road and the track and is has exceeded my expectations. I firmly believe after reviewing the stories out there over the past year or so that the people primarily experiencing engine failures are those who did not break them in per the Dodge manual. Time and time again when I ask the question (and actually get a response) you learn they put about 500 miles or so on their Demon 170 before racing it mistakenly believing that is the proper standard - its not. And low and behold these same folks have an engine failure just like Dodge warns can happen in the manual if you dont follow thier break-in instructions including the 1,500 mile standard before tracking . So whether the lack of proper break-in is the problem or not the public record so far certainly points clearly in that direction. And, regardless, you cannot fairly attack the reliablity of a car when you don't follow the engine manufacturer's break-in instructions. Regarding this missing bearing story, I have seen an engine builder or two post that its almost impossible for an engine to run with a missing main bearing, and my Dodge mechanic, who works at a Dodge Power Broker location, claims the such an engine would start knocking almost immediately off the assembly line if it would start at all. So when I have asked for a copy of the entire work invoice behind the story you have posted (excluding personal information of course) nobody is willing to provide it. Thats fine, of course, but if you are not going to back up your story with credible evidence that should be readily available I am not going to give the story much if any credilibity - and neither would a judge in a courtroom by the way. And, I have seen this time and time again with some YouTubers who make bold claims attacking the relialbity of the Demon 170 but provide little to no verifiable evidence to support thier claims in many instances. Why not? Its easy to upload such work orders, right? And, if you can post a 15-30 minutes video calling into question the Demon 170 you can certainly upload supporting documents that take a minute or so, right? Unfortunately, I think certain YouTubers have over the past year engaged in some serious and reckless speculation about the reliablity of the Demon 170, and, as a result, have unfairly tarnished its name and its value. I say "unfair" because of the lack of credible evidence that is almost always absent or highly lacking in completeness. Other you YouTubers scream out that Demon 170 prices are nose diving but ignore recent public sales that clearly indiate otherwise, even when its provided to them in the comment section. To add insult to injury it appars some YouTubers then delete that data (which YouTube permits by the way) to hide those competing sales from their viewers. So, pesonally, I would not be concerned about storing one as these Demon 170s as collector car for a single moment. However, I might change my mind if sombody posted credible evidence of repeated engine failures in Demon 170 AFTER they were first broken-in the full 1,500 miles. You and I both broke our cars in the full 1,500 miles and so far neither you or I have had any type of engine failure problems, and I am seeing that same result on Facebook with other Demon 170 owners as well. Time will tell, but enjoy your Demon 170 my friend. I have very much enjoyed wathing your YouTube channel, and I hope to see you on the track some day!