So I’m seeing around 500hp on my Hellcat Durango and curious if this is low? The Tq is also higher than HP which I figured would be the other way around. Just trying to figure out if something is going on. Really doesn’t feel that powerful once you get moving. Not trying to complain, but want my ducks in a row before I go back to my dealer again. Attached is a 0-90 pull, 8XX alt, 50* temp. Looking at Trackhawk graphs they’re showing Hp above 600
View attachment 582051
View attachment 582052
The 707 number came from the engine being run on a dyno under I dare say "ideal" conditions.
Remember HP is derived from torque and RPM. If the RPMs are not high enough you'll never see the factory "HP". And in the case of the torque being displayed it too is a derived value possibly derived in part at least from the OBD2 "engine load" parameter.
Even if you managed to see 707 on the HP gauge given the engine is in the car accelerating considerable mass (approx. 4600lbs) and pushing "tons' of air and then there is the drive train loss the 707 number has to be derived and tweaked a bit -- some "correction" added -- to arrive at the 707hp number.
After break in I tried a few hard pulls with my Hellcat and never saw "707" hp. This does not mean the engine was performing sub par only that I just didn't have -- possibly -- the right conditions. Not sure even with the right or best conditions I could have managed to see 707.
With another car, fitted with (from the factory) turbos, nominal boost was 0.7 bar. Gave the car a few hard pulls and only managed to see 0.6 bar. Talked to the senior techs. They told me the engine controller seeks to produce the amount of torque demanded by the driver as signaled through the electronic throttle. If all it takes is 0.6 bar of boost that's all you will see.
Armed with this I picked a "better" location to try for 0.7 bar boost. An uphill grade with several miles of no freeway on/off ramps and no place for a CHP to hide. Also, I had a V1 in the car.
In 4th gear I floored -- and I mean floored -- the gas pedal. Speed built up very quickly but as RPMs rose I saw a solid 0.7 bar. But as RPMs got higher boost fell off a bit. Maybe because the factory called for 93 octane gasoline with 91 being ok but 93 was not available where I lived.
With the Hellcat there just wasn't enough room/road to subject it to the same "test". The turbo charged engine produced 420hp and the car began to eat up road at an alarming rate. The Hellcat and its 707hp would have gobbled up that section of road -- and it did -- with ease.
It is very rare for an engine to have a problem that limits its total output below that of what it should produce and not manifest other signs of this problem.
That I never saw 707hp from my Hellcat didn't bother me. I could tell -- butt dyno -- it had all the power it was supposed to have.