Just saw this article tonight. Forgive me if it's already been posted... Dodge CEO Hints That Current Charger and Challenger Will Live Past 2024
The math doesn't work that way. A Charger Hellcat has an EPA combined MPG of 15 while an SXT has 23. Say roughly 10% of Charger sales are Hellcats while 90% are SXT models. Getting the handful of Hellcats up from 15 to 40 or 50 isn't anywhere as impactful as getting the vast, vast number of SXT cars up from 23 to 40 or 50.My guess, they replace hellcats first with electric, as top performance variant. This will help the fleet average the most by replacing the biggest emissions offenders. Maybe this will buy more time for regular V8 and V6 with the EPA.
If only there were some sort of machine that can measure the parts-per-million content of the atmosphere. Then there'd be proof for the tree-huggers that they're wrong... and that they're going to get bigger, faster trees. Despite record annual loss of forest cover.BTW, the CO2 hoax is just a tax grab. More CO2, green plants just grow faster and gobble it up.
Well, of course. Because it's absurd that any quantity of any substance that's already on the planet could change climate. I mean... like... what, you move your socks from the dirty pile into the washing machine and it's going to rain? Absurd.It doesn't cause climate change.
Absolutely. Because physics cares about motivation, and it knows... if a climatologist burns a campfire, they're being a hypocrite, so it makes sure they don't get to be right.It is just "one rule set for me, and another one for thee" in action. How many climate hoaxers fly coach or even 1st class, instead of taking their private jets?
That makes sense, thanks. Did not think that through lol. I have heard that Dodge is fined for the hellcats given smog ratings. Any truth to this? If so, given the pressure from the current administration and EPA, I just won’t be surprised to see them go first.The math doesn't work that way. A Charger Hellcat has an EPA combined MPG of 15 while an SXT has 23. Say roughly 10% of Charger sales are Hellcats while 90% are SXT models. Getting the handful of Hellcats up from 15 to 40 or 50 isn't anywhere as impactful as getting the vast, vast number of SXT cars up from 23 to 40 or 50.
Also, all the cost of R&D and tooling work to create a completely new platform needs to be spread over many vehicles in order to not make a loss. They need to sell a lot of whatever the next generation is, to justify creating it in the first place.
I don't pretend to have a crystal ball, but replacing the low-volume cars first doesn't make sense from either a financial or results standpoint.
If the platform goes beyond 2023 then the possibility exists that they will build over 1 million Challengers before production stops. Who would have seen that when in 2008 they thought the Challenger would run for 5 years and that was their benchmark for success.
[/QUOT
All bout the Benjamin’s
The issue is that Dodge has been afoul of CAFE standards for a number of years. It isn't just the Hellcats, it's all of their V8s having no offset that's the issue. Ford has their 5.0s, but they also have hybrid and flex fuel high efficiency 4-bangers that offset the fleet rating for their V8s. Dodge doesn't have any offsets. Thus, they have been operating and producing cars and trucks via a loophole that allows them to purchase carbon credits from Tesla. Tesla has loads of credits to sell. FCA and Tesla had a 1.8 billion carbon tax credit trade deal through 2022.That makes sense, thanks. Did not think that through lol. I have heard that Dodge is fined for the hellcats given smog ratings. Any truth to this? If so, given the pressure from the current administration and EPA, I just won’t be surprised to see them go first.
Bingo.Unfortunately it takes effort to acquire the information (e.g. read), then actually think about it (even more difficult) then draw logical conclusions (completely out of the question).