SRT Hellcat Forum banner
  • Hey Everyone! Vote for the Site Favourite HOTM winner for the year of 2022 HERE!

Magnuson 18 widebody

1707 Views 14 Replies 4 Participants Last post by  Himmelkat
Anybody running a magnuson 2650 on there 18+ hellcat besides me and love it?My current set up is Maggie,vvt comp cam,pp heads,manley springs,retainers,pushrods,vvt limeter,10% lower,pinned crank,bbk 100mm TB,arh long tubes no cats,are intake,big jons dual idler,cog set up is 36t and 32t,front pulley 3.0,1050's,kb bap,and she made 1080rwhp on 19pounds at 6100rpm and was running out of fuel(105oct) tune.
1 - 15 of 15 Posts
Anybody running a magnuson 2650 on there 18+ hellcat besides me and love it?My current set up is Maggie,vvt comp cam,pp heads,manley springs,retainers,pushrods,vvt limeter,10% lower,pinned crank,bbk 100mm TB,arh long tubes no cats,are intake,big jons dual idler,cog set up is 36t and 32t,front pulley 3.0,1050's,kb bap,and she made 1080rwhp on 19pounds at 6100rpm and was running out of fuel(105oct) tune.
im kind of doing this now but on a 426 and spinning to 7000
  • Like
Reactions: 1
Anybody running a magnuson 2650 on there 18+ hellcat besides me and love it?My current set up is Maggie,vvt comp cam,pp heads,manley springs,retainers,pushrods,vvt limeter,10% lower,pinned crank,bbk 100mm TB,arh long tubes no cats,are intake,big jons dual idler,cog set up is 36t and 32t,front pulley 3.0,1050's,kb bap,and she made 1080rwhp on 19pounds at 6100rpm and was running out of fuel(105oct) tune.
Are you on the stock shortblock?

Sent from my SM-G781U using Tapatalk
  • Like
Reactions: 1
im kind of doing this now but on a 426 and spinning to 7000
Are you on the stock shortblock?

Sent from my SM-G781U using Tapatalk
Yes
im kind of doing this now but on a 426 and spinning to 7000
I think your going to love it(y)gonna make some good #'s for sure,enjoy sir.
  • Like
Reactions: 1
I am still wanting to experiment with ludicrous 3" primary headers to see how they act on a supercharged engine. If that were to capable of being made workable, then 6" primaries would be next LOL.

"Correct backpressure" is "Deep space vacuum"

I know that in a pulsed-flow system, you take advantage of the elasticity of the air to "pull" exhaust out of the port using the rarefaction of the air to do so, even as you utilize the elasticity of the air to create a springy cushion of air just waiting to burst forth into the combustion chamber when the intake valve opens.

I know that the best way to achieve appropriate frequency match between peak rarefaction/compression is VELOCITY, just like throwing a softball attached to a slinky as hard as you can will result in more stretch than weakly tossing it.

BUT, at some point, the tradeoff between the power needed to create said velocity in a finite-sized pipe/conduit and the pumping losses at higher RPM/flow volume becomes greater than the advantage in power production.

The cam profile could be designed to optimize response to the stupidly-large exhaust pipes, but alas, the very thing that would take advantage of the sizing at high RPM would be, no surprise, detrimental to low-RPM operation.

Ideally, the intake and exhaust tracts would resize on the fly to produce maximum power and minimum restriction. This is possible with existing technology, but the cost would be higher than a static tract design.

I know it's about finding the right balance, but for every single RPM, load, throttle opening, etc. there is one absolutely peak, ideal, perfect set of parameters of lift, duration, tract size, header configuration, etc. Varying each of these on the fly to perfectly match each possible situation would be a work that only God himself could do, but that does not change the fact that for every given desired level of power output, there is one ideal set of parameters for it.

Having said that, I think there are more precisely-sized and shaped designs for headers that are out there, yet undiscovered, because discovering them costs money, and producing them may cost more than has been the norm.
See less See more
Is the 36t and 32t rear pulleys the stock ones that it comes with?

Sent from my SM-G781U using Tapatalk
No I belive it comes with 2 30t stock,my setup is about 13% overdrive you can go to 27% with 38t and 30t👍
No I belive it comes with 2 30t stock,my setup is about 13% overdrive you can go to 27% with 38t and 30t👍
Hmm.....I thought the 36t and 30t was 27%. Now I am confused, lol.
I spoke with Wyatt Jon from magnuson and was told 38t and 30t was 27% and that's what they sent me:oops:.
I spoke with Wyatt Jon from magnuson and was told 38t and 30t was 27% and that's what they sent me:oops:.
Good to know. Thanks for the feedback. I ordered the 2 cog pulley and belt kit. Says 36t and 30t. Looks like I did not need the 30t, if the stock blower comes with that. This kit says 3.5#s of boost increase over stock.
My tuner didn't even bother with the cogs he put the 3.0 on and hit 1080 gained about 3lbs of boost.First tune on 99oct and 3.49 pulley car made 830 car has 3.25 on it know making 1017 and 967

Attachments

See less See more
My tuner didn't even bother with the cogs he put the 3.0 on and hit 1080 gained about 3lbs of boost.First tune on 99oct and 3.49 pulley car made 830 car has 3.25 on it know making 1017 and 967
So with the 3.0 upper and stock jackshaft pullies it made 19#s and 1080hp?

Sent from my SM-G781U using Tapatalk
No I have 36t and 32t which magnuson said is 13% overdrive and 3.0 front was on for the 1080 pull on 105 Oct.
1 - 15 of 15 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top