Has anybody tried the Killer Chiller from Kincaid Performance? The Mustang guys seem to really like it. Claim 40 to 50 HP thru cooler intake temps and less timing retard. Now making a Hellcat kit.
Stock intercooler coolant capacity is 4.5 quarts or 1.25 gallons. Without an additional reservoir tank(s), I think net capacity might actually be lower after bypassing both LTR heat exchangers and after adding the KC. What options are out there for adding capacity besides custom fabrication?1.5 to 2 gallon total fluid capacity.
I'd seen that Kincaid sells an electric Bypass as well as a manual. It looks like it'd be cheaper to just buy a manual 3-way Bypass valve, barbs, clamps, and Heater hose for around $40. I haven't looked at the heat exchanger tubing yet, will likely do so this weekend.Make sure you bypass the heat exchangers and ideally, keep about 1.5 to 2 gallon total fluid capacity.
I have the manual bypass coming in my order. I used a different code though, DH1, also saves $50, free shipping, and includes a free HE bypass kit.He also gave me a coupon code if you buy a KC from their site you can save $50 - DH2
I imagine you would have to route a 2nd coolant line that skips the two heat exchangers where it gets tee'd before and after the HEs. Before the HEs would be the bypass valve that you turn manually to change the flow path. One problem is accessing the valve if it's mounted anywhere in the front bumper. I'm going to try to put it closer to the bottom where I can reach it from underneath the car without too much trouble.How would you go about placing this bypass valve?
As you already know, a heat exchanger works by cooling liquid down towards ambient temps but unless something else funky is happening, it can't ever go below ambient. Add a Killer Chiller to the mix and now it's cooling fluid down significantly below ambient so when this cold fluid passes back through a heat exchanger, the HE works against the Killer Chiller by transferring heat back into the fluid to bring temps back up towards ambient. So, the idea behind bypassing the HEs is to allow the KC to work without being undermined by other components in the intercooler system.Maybe i''m just dense but why would we want to bypass the Heat Exchanger only to to replace it with a Chiller Tank? Wouldn't that be the same as not bypassing the H/E thereby raising the temperature of the fluid if a majority of it is just sitting in the hot engine bay?
I'm going by Computer Watercooling (Which is not below ambient or using a refrigerant under pressure and maybe that's the major difference here) But the difference between me having a water pump drawing fluid in and out of a 5 gallon jug of water vs a 200ml reservoir wouldn't change the water temperature by any significant degree.
I guess after thinking about it it might prolong the amount of time it takes before the loop reaches working equilibrium. But at that point it would just mean more coolant is at the same temp, right?
Maybe if I could seal the top and only have one path in and one path out. The shape would probably make it hard to place somewhere inside the bumper area, which would be my goal. If you had something else in mind, perhaps you can elaborate?View attachment 200321 Curious has anyone considered this tank for use ?
Ahh ok, this makes sense. Do you know if the A/C is shutoff by the PCM/BCM or is it a mechanical type shutoff if the Belt RPM's exceed X? If it were a PCM/BCM shutoff I'd think that could be tuned out. Not sure about the effects on a compressor with the clutch engaged with the belt turning at 5500rpm though.As for extra capacity, it's been proven that by adding extra intercooler coolant capacity, IC coolant temps will rise slower when making a pass down the track. Science backed by real world results using many other different methods like ice tanks and increased capacity. The A/C will shut off during WOT operation so the KC will no longer continue cooling after mashing the pedal. The rate of temperature rise of the IC fluid during a pass will be primarily dependent on the volume of coolant because the source and energy of the heat remains constant from the blower. In theory...
Hopefully i'll know soon enough, I have my tablet with the HP Tuners connection, so that should def. be an item you could tag and record.I think what you're missing is that our source of heat, the blower, is significant. Honestly though, I've never paid attention to IC temps at the track since I haven't figured out how to log it. My IATs though will start around 110-120 on a warm day and end in the 145-155 range after a pass.
They do have one of those electric 3-way bypass kits, I would think adding an in-line temperature sensor could be wired into a relay or a computer (similar to a raspberry pi) that if the measured temperature exceeded a certain threshold (Temperature increase over time or something) would open the valve.Wouldn't it be awesome if we could figure out how to automatically bypass the HE's as long as IC temps are below ambient?
It's configurable in the tune. In my stock and modified tune, it's triggered based on throttle position. Factory settings will deactivate the A/C clutch when the pedal gets pushed beyond a specific threshold very close to WOT, at any RPM... I know, it's odd and it could just be that the tuning software doesn't have all the parameters exposed to see how other hidden parameters might also affect this behavior. Compressors are expensive so I wouldn't try to tune out this functionality. For drag racing, you only need to keep IATs low enough so the PCM doesn't pull timing.Ahh ok, this makes sense. Do you know if the A/C is shutoff by the PCM/BCM or is it a mechanical type shutoff if the Belt RPM's exceed X? If it were a PCM/BCM shutoff I'd think that could be tuned out. Not sure about the effects on a compressor with the clutch engaged with the belt turning at 5500rpm though
Same here, let me know if you find the parameter to log IC temps. I keep looking and I keep finding new interesting things to log but not this...Hopefully i'll know soon enough, I have my tablet with the HP Tuners connection, so that should def. be an item you could tag and record.
Guess what I have sitting on my desk...They do have one of those electric 3-way bypass kits, I would think adding an in-line temperature sensor could be wired into a relay or a computer (similar to a raspberry pi) that if the measured temperature exceeded a certain threshold (Temperature increase over time or something) would open the valve.
An SSD card?Guess what I have sitting on my desk...
![]()
As you already know, a heat exchanger works by cooling liquid down towards ambient temps but unless something else funky is happening, it can't ever go below ambient. Add a Killer Chiller to the mix and now it's cooling fluid down significantly below ambient so when this cold fluid passes back through a heat exchanger, the HE works against the Killer Chiller by transferring heat back into the fluid to bring temps back up towards ambient. So, the idea behind bypassing the HEs is to allow the KC to work without being undermined by other components in the intercooler system.
As for extra capacity, it's been proven that by adding extra intercooler coolant capacity, IC coolant temps will rise slower when making a pass down the track. Science backed by real world results using many other different methods like ice tanks and increased capacity.
In regards to the KC, the A/C will shut off during WOT operation so the KC will no longer continue cooling after mashing the pedal. This means the rate of temperature rise of the IC fluid during a pass will be primarily dependent on the volume of coolant because the source and energy of the heat remains constant from the blower. In theory...
I think what you're missing is that our source of heat, the blower, is significant. Honestly though, I've never paid attention to IC temps at the track since I haven't figured out how to log it. My IATs though will start around 110-120 on a warm day and end in the 145-155 range after a pass.
Wouldn't it be awesome if we could figure out how to automatically bypass the HE's as long as IC temps are below ambient?